In this section we provide the remaining details of the
-approximation. Previous studies, as well as our own
results, have shown that in the positive
Hubbard model the
long-ranged contributions to the self-energy are dominated by the spin
and charge fluctuations of the system. In contrast, pairing
fluctuations are less significant and do not change the qualitative
multi-scale results, unless very low temperatures are considered. The
self-energy determination in the results section for the lowest order
in
approximation to
considers all three
channels. However, the remaining higher order cases are restricted to
only the self-energy contribution of the particle-hole channel. An
equivalent derivation to the following can be trivially extended to
the particle-particle channel.
Starting with the -approximation introduced in
sections 3.2.2 (Eqs. 3.8 and 3.9),
the Bethe-Salpeter equation (Eq. 3.7) for the approximated
large cluster reducible vertex function can be coarse-grained to the
small cluster (see section 3.6 for further details):
where we coarse grained the bare particle-hole
susceptibility bubble (internal legs in Fig. 3.4 which are
lattice Green's functions). We call this coarse grained
susceptibility
![]() |
(3.15) |
Furthermore, while the coarse-graining (sum over internal
moment
) is to the small cluster, the self-energy in
originates from the large cluster. The resulting reducible vertex
function
however, is still only defined for
small cluster momenta but incorporates large cluster corrections from
the coarse grained susceptibility
. Due to these
long-ranged contributions, the reducible vertex constructed in this
manner is not equivalent to a QMC evaluated small cluster
.
The resulting Bethe-Salpeter equation (3.14) is most easily
solved for
in the following matrix form
![]() |
(3.16) |
where the matrix indices correspond to the internal momenta and frequency.
At this point, the self-energies can now finally be evaluated using the Dyson equation as illustrated in Fig. 3.3. On the large cluster this yields:
![]() |
(3.17) |
Here we interpolate the small cluster momentum
(for details see section 3.6) and
subtracted
in the parenthesis to prevent an over
counting of the second order term.
In the calculation of the transverse spin fluctuation part, recall
that
where we define
as the
correlation function of
and
, and
as
the correlation function formed from
. Then as
, we have that
and
. This means that
for the self-energy on the large cluster,
While for the real-space implementation of the Ansatz,
knowledge of the large cluster self-energy in the
-approximation is sufficient, the momentum-space version
requires the corresponding self-energy diagrams on the small cluster
as well. An equivalent calculation on the small cluster yields for the
self-energy in
-approximation
![]() |
(3.19) |
where all single-particle propagators have been replaced by
, including the ones entering the bare bubble
.
We want to reiterate that the -approximated self energy thus
obtained, is only accurate for long-ranged correlations. In order to obtain a
viable multi-scale solution, the neglected short-ranged correlations
have to be accounted for by means of the Ansatz, as outlined in
the previous section.